Skip to main content

How safe are the hand held cellphones?

Since April 1 when Nova Scotia outlawed the use of hand-held cellphones while driving, sales of hands-free devices have gone through the roof. It seems everyone’s driving—even walking—with tiny electronic devices tucked into their ears. Conventional wisdom says they’re safer. With wireless technology such as Bluetooth becoming commonplace, you can still conduct business, order pizza or talk to mom while keeping both hands on the wheel. But is the mind on the road? A Dalhousie PhD student in experimental psychology says hands-free cellphones are not safer and indeed may even be more dangerous than hand-held.

Killam scholar Yoko Ishigami presented her paper, “Is a hands-free phone safer than a hand-held phone?” at the national conference of the Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals held last month in Whistler, B.C. She was awarded first place in a national student paper competition. “Talking and listening are such complicated tasks, especially if you’re thinking ahead to what you’re going to say,” says Ms. Ishigami, an international student from Shizuoka, Japan. “The conversation is what takes all your attention.” She surveyed current scientific research on cellphone use, showing that talking on the phone, regardless of phone type, has negative impacts on performance, especially when the driver is confronted by complex or unpredictable situations. Performance while using a hands-free phone was rarely found to be better than that using a hand-held phone. Some studies found drivers compensate for the harmful effects of cellphone use when using a hand-held phone—by driving slower or pulling over to finish a call—but neglect to do so when using a hands-free phone.

“People tend to be over confident with hands-free and drive faster. They’re thinking, ‘I’m OK because I’ve got on the headgear,” she explains. “Whereas if they were driving with a hand-held phone, they tend to drive slower.” Ms. Ishigami says the topic of cellphone use while driving has interested her since she was an undergraduate psychology student at the University of Victoria. She recalls being at a pedestrian crosswalk ready to cross the road as a car approached. Locking eyes with the driver, she proceeded across, but had to jump back to curb when she realized the driver wasn’t going to stop. The driver, who was holding up a phone to her ear, didn’t even see her.

“When you’re talking on the phone, your attention is on the conversation. You may be looking at things but that doesn’t mean you’re processing that information.” One Canadian study Ms. Ishigami reviewed demonstrated that talking on a cellphone while driving increased the risk of an accident four-fold, and that whether the phone was hand held or hands free made no difference to the risk. Considering all the research, she concludes all cellphone use while driving should be banned. So far, Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec and Nova Scotia in Canada, and California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Washington in United States have banned hand-held cellphones while driving. India may be the only country in the world which bans both hand-held and hands-free phones while driving.

In Nova Scotia, penalties, including court costs, are just under $165 for a first offence. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the first province to enact a cellphone law in 2003, fines can be as high as $400, plus demerit points. Ontario is considering similar legislation to stop drivers from using cellphones and BlackBerrys while behind the wheel. “I think what’s troubling is that hands-free devices are rarely banned, and indeed even encouraged,” says Ms. Ishigami.

Dalhouse psychology professor Raymond Klein hopes legislators will pay attention to Ms. Ishigami’s research. “No one should be surprised that driving while talking on a cellphone is dangerous. But finding that this danger is not much reduced, or reduced at all, by using a hands-free phone is news,” says Dr. Klein. “It is correct but incomplete to think ‘we drive with our hands’ and therefore using them for another activity (dialing, eating, etcetera) might be unsafe. We drive with our minds too … and it’s essential that our attention is devoted entirely to the task of driving.” Source: Delhousie Univ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Charging Implanted Heart Pumps Wirelessly

Mechanical pumps to give failing hearts a boost were originally developed as temporary measures for patients awaiting a heart transplant. But as the technology has improved, these ventricular assist devices commonly operate in patients for years, including in former vice-president Dick Cheney, whose implant this month celebrates its one-year anniversary. Prolonged use, however, has its own problems. The power cord that protrudes through the patient's belly is cumbersome and prone to infection over time. Infections occur in close to 40 percent of patients, are the leading cause of rehospitalization, and can be fatal. Researchers at the University of Washington and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center have tested a wireless power system for ventricular assist devices. They recently presented the work in Washington, D.C. at the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs annual meeting, where it received the Willem Kolff/Donald B. Olsen Award for most promising research in

Autism and Eye Contact: Genes very much are involved

We have now a lot of evidence on genetic components in many disorders including neurological in both adults and kids. Autism is one such problem that has many genes involved. Research is still in full swing to find more genes and related pathways. However, one can find autistic features more phenotypically before genotyping. Eye contact is one of them. Studies have shown that autistic kids make less eye contact. This has been shown to have genetic component now. New research has uncovered compelling evidence that genetics plays a major role in how children look at the world and whether they have a preference for gazing at people's eyes and faces or at objects. The discovery by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta adds new detail to understanding the causes of autism spectrum disorder. The results show that the moment-to-moment movements of children's eyes as they seek visual information about the

How much people depend on weather reports

Meteorologists on television, radio, online, and in newspapers supply weather reports to the average person over 100 times a month. Surveys demonstrated that the 300 billion forecasts accessed generate a value of $285 per household every year, or $32 billion for the entire United States. Odds are you have already watched one weather forecast today and will probably check out a few more. Accurate, timely forecasts are vital to everyday life, but just how critical may surprise you. Whether at work or play, you probably watch the weather quite closely. Most of us are at the weather person's mercy to know what to wear, what to expect, to prepare for the worst. New research shows the average United States household checks out a weather report more than three times a day. "It impacts pretty much every part of every activity we are involved with for the most part," Jeff Lazo, the director of the Societal Impacts Program at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in B